The constitutional and statutory requirements of electing Filipino citizenship apply only to legitimate children

0 comments

Facts: Chule Y. Lim filed a petition for correction of entries under Rule 108 of the Rules of Court with the RTC. During the hearing, she testified thus:

First, she claims that her surname Yu was misspelled as Yo. She has been using Yu in all her school records and in her marriage certificate. She presented a clearance from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to further show the consistency in her use of the surname Yu.

Second, she claims that her fathers name in her birth record was written as Yo Diu To (Co Tian) when it should have been Yu Dio To (Co Tian).

Third, her nationality was entered as Chinese when it should have been Filipino considering that her father and mother never got married. Only her deceased father was Chinese, while her mother is Filipina. She claims that her being a registered voter attests to the fact that she is a Filipino citizen.

Finally, it was erroneously indicated in her birth certificate that she was a legitimate child when she should have been described as illegitimate considering that her parents were never married.

Placida Anto, respondents mother, testified that she is a Filipino citizen as her parents were both Filipinos from Camiguin. She added that she and her daughters father were never married because the latter had a prior subsisting marriage contracted in China.

In this connection, respondent presented a certification attested by officials of the local civil registries of Iligan City and Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte that there is no record of marriage between Placida Anto and Yu Dio To from 1948 to the present.

The trial court granted the petition. CA affirmed the decision. 

The Republic appealed contending that Lim did not comply with the constitutional requirement of electing Filipino citizenship when she reached the age of majority. It cites Article IV, Section 1(3) of the 1935 Constitution, which provides that the citizenship of a legitimate child born of a Filipino mother and an alien father followed the citizenship of the father, unless, upon reaching the age of majority, the child elected Philippine citizenship. Likewise, the Republic invokes the provision in Section 1 of Commonwealth Act No. 625, that legitimate children born of Filipino mothers may elect Philippine citizenship by expressing such intention in a statement to be signed and sworn to by the party concerned before any officer authorized to administer oaths, and shall be filed with the nearest civil registry. The said party shall accompany the aforesaid statement with the oath of allegiance to the Constitution and the Government of the Philippines.

Issue: Whether or not Lim complied with the legal requirement in electing her citizenship

Held: There is no need for Lim to comply with the legal requirement of electing Filipino citizenship. 

"The above constitutional and statutory requirements of electing Filipino citizenship apply only to legitimate children. These do not apply in the case of respondent who was concededly an illegitimate child, considering that her Chinese father and Filipino mother were never married. As such, she was not required to comply with said constitutional and statutory requirements to become a Filipino citizen. By being an illegitimate child of a Filipino mother, respondent automatically became a Filipino upon birth. Stated differently, she is a Filipino since birth without having to elect Filipino citizenship when she reached the age of majority." (Republic vs. Chule Y. Lim, G.R. No. 153883,  January 13, 2004). 

Leave a Reply